On Tuesday, August 13th, the local area was
blanketed with copies of “National Sunday Law,” a short book written by A. Jan
Marcussen. It is unclear who sent this
mass mailing to our local area; the only clue is the postage mark, which tells us
that these books were sent by a non-profit organization which received their
mailing permit in Okeene, Oklahoma. However,
it is apparent that somebody thought it was important enough for all of us to
read this book that they bought a large number of copies, enough to send one to
every address within the target area.
So what is this book?
To be honest, I’d never heard of it before I found it within my
mailbox. But knowing that others were
receiving it, I sat down to read this 70-page book (not counting all of the
appendices) so that I could discuss it with anyone who might read it and ask me
about it. If you would like to skip the
reading of the book and get right to the discussion, you can continue on to my
thoughts below.
First, here is a summary of the book. This book was written back in 1983 to address
a perceived crisis: that several politicians were advocating for new laws that enshrined
Sunday as a day of worship within individual states or within the whole nation
(essentially, a national “blue law”).
The author acknowledges that this would violate the 1st
Amendment to the United States Constitution (i.e. freedom of religion), but
that is not the author’s true concern.
No, the real problem is that these politicians would be enshrining the
wrong day as the day of worship. In the
author’s mind, the “Sabbath” must be observed on Saturday and not on
Sunday. The author’s argument is that
the Church has followed the lead of Satan and changed the day for worship to
Sunday, which was the day the pagan Romans designated as the day to worship the
sun god(s); this change violates the 4th Commandment: remember the
Sabbath day (i.e. the 7th day, Saturday) and keep it holy. By following the lead of Satan and allowing
the day of worship to be corrupted, most of the Church has accepted “the mark
of the beast” as described in Revelation and will be condemned by the Lord when
the Lord returns to initiate the resurrection and the end of the age. And if the United States approves these laws
establishing Sunday as the day of worship, then the United States will be the
second beast in Revelation 13 that takes over for the Roman Catholic Church,
the first beast. Only those who maintain
the true Sabbath, Saturday, will receive the seal of the Holy Spirit and be
welcomed into the Kingdom of Heaven on the day of judgment.
Did you follow all of that?
If you did not, that’s okay, because the author’s argument is flawed on
several fronts. Here is where I see
problems with the author’s argument:
1) From what I can tell, there was not a serious effort to
establish a national “blue law” or more statewide “blue laws” within individual
states during the 1980s or after the 1980s.
In fact, the trend has been to eliminate the blue laws that were already
on the books. That, combined with
societal trends, shows that Sunday is LESS established as a day set aside for
worship today compared to the early 1980s.
2) The author treats Revelation as prophecy foretelling the
future. However, prophecy in the Bible
can also be a way of “forthtelling,” or interpreting the events of the
present. While portions of Revelation
are obviously looking ahead to a distant future, there is also a good amount of
“forthtelling” in Revelation much in the way that political cartoons
communicate certain ways of looking at current events. Viewing Revelation as a series of “political
cartoons” is a better way of understanding much of Revelation compared to
viewing Revelation as a play-by-play of future events.
3) Any attempt to identify the United States as the primary
intention of a symbol within “The Apocalypse of John,” more commonly known as “Revelation,”
is an exercise in reading into the Bible what you want to find within the
Bible, a practice known as “eisegesis.” Eisegesis
is widely considered to be a poor way of interpreting the Bible because it
prioritizes supporting what you already believe to be true rather than focusing
on what the Bible actually says. Here,
the author claims that the second beast of Revelation 13 is the symbol of the
United States, even though the author of Revelation clearly had the Roman
Empire in mind. (It’s worth noting that
describing the Americas as an unpopulated wilderness also ignores the many
Native American tribes and other indigenous peoples that lived throughout North
and South America at the time they were “discovered” by Europeans.)
4) The identification of the first beast of Revelation 13 as
the Roman Catholic Church is an exercise in anti-Catholic bigotry. Again, the beasts of Romans 13 have the Roman
Empire in mind, not entities that would not exist for multiple centuries after
the writing of Revelation. The two
beasts along with the dragon of Revelation 12 form the triumvirate (Satan, the
military might of the Roman Empire, and the cultural oppression of the Roman
Empire) that opposes the Triune God.
5) The “seal of God” is given to us in baptism. It is not a designation of Saturday as the
only day for worshipping the Lord.
6) The “mark of the beast” was a reference to a literal mark
on the hand that many Roman communities required you to bear before you could
buy and sell within the marketplace.
Many Christian communities refused to bear this mark because participating
in the marketplace meant using currency that declared the Roman Emperor as Lord
of all. They viewed using this currency
as an implicit agreement with the declaration, which would put them in
violation of the 1st Commandment: “I am the Lord your God; you shall
have no other gods before me.”
7) The author tries to have it both ways when it comes to a
biblical event happening on “the first day of the week.” In appendix 10, the author discusses Acts
20:7-8, in which Paul meets with certain disciples on the first day of the
week. Their time together includes a
moment where they “break bread,” a common reference for participating in what
we now know as Holy Communion. The
author points out that a Jewish day goes from sunset to sunset rather than
midnight to midnight; therefore, according to the author, this group is still
worshipping on Saturday. However, Paul
and the others would dispute this identification; for them, it is already Sunday.
8) Finally, all of this is based off of the author’s
insistence that the Sabbath must fall on Saturday, the last day of the week. The day of rest comes from the Genesis
accounts of creation, in which the Lord creates all things over the course of
six “days” before resting on the seventh “day.”
While many understand these to be 24-hour days, this is an assumption
that a “day” in this “pre-history” portion of the Bible is the same as a “day”
as we understand it. Meanwhile, Jesus
also told the Pharisees that “The Sabbath was made for humankind, and not
humankind for the Sabbath…” which is to say that which day we take to rest and
worship is not nearly as important as that we do stop and take a day for rest
and worship. The command and invitation
for Sabbath rest is meant to be a joy and blessing for us and not a
hardship. If taking Sabbath on a
Saturday (or Sunday) is a hardship, we should be free to designate another day
as our day of Sabbath rest rather than restricted to Saturday (or Sunday) or
bust.
Based on these objections, I do not recommend that you read
this book. If you choose to read it, I
hope that you read it with your eyes open to the fact that the author is trying
to manipulate you into an absolute position regarding the day of worship, even
to the point of threatening you with damnation if you do not comply with his
reasoning. While his interpretation of
Revelation and other passages sounds informed, he is stretching the passages
beyond recognition so that they fit within his narrative. And the great crisis he wished to address has
never arrived in the past 36 years and the current trend lines move in the
opposite direction of what he feared would happen. So if you choose to read this book, read it
without fear of coming judgment over whether you worship the Lord on Saturday,
Sunday, or another day of the week.
Did I miss anything?
Do you have other comments or questions regarding the book you received
or a portion of my writings here? Share
your insights and questions in the comments below and we can discuss your
concerns!